Roseville MN Homepage
Search
 

View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission


Meeting Minutes

Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:30 p.m.

 

1.            Introduction / Call Roll

Vice Chair Cihacek called the meeting to order at approximately 6:00 p.m. and Public Works Director Mark Culver called the roll.

 

Members Present: Vice Chair Brian Cihacek, Members Joe Wozniak, , Kody Thurnau, John Heimerl, Sarah Brodt Lenz, and Duane Seigler; with Chair Dwayne Stenlund arriving at approximately 6:05 pm

 

Staff Present:          Public Works Director Marc Culver and City Engineer Jesse Freihammer

2.            Public Comments

Public Works Director Culver Marc introduced the City of Roseville’s newest City Engineer, Jesse Freihammer, and provided a brief review of his career and expertise in the field as Jesse relocates from the Brainerd, MN area to this area.

 

3.            Approval of June 23, 2015 Meeting Minutes

Member Lenz moved, Member Heimerl seconded, approval of the June 23, 2015, meeting as amended. 

 

Corrections:

·         Page 7, Lines 299-300 (Wozniak)

Correct to read: “… required due to the potential authority to direct trash from landfills into recycling; and hopes to divert more trash…”

 

Ayes: 6

Nays: 0

Motion carried.

 

4.            Communication Items

Chair Stenlund arrived at this time; approximately 6:05 pm

 

Public Works Director Culver reviewed project updates and maintenance activities listed in the staff report and attachments dated July 28, 2015.  Due to limited time for the business portion of tonight’s meeting, Mr. Culver asked individual members of the PWETC to contact staff for any additional information or if they had questions.

 

5.            City Campus Solar Panel Installation Proposal Review and Recommendation

Public Works Director Culver provided a quick overview of two proposals received for a solar panel installation on the Oval/Skating Center roofs, as detailed in the staff report dated July 28, 2015; and as displayed via Power Point presentation, a copy of which is made a part of the staff report and attached hereto and made a part hereof.

 

Mr. Culver noted receipt of two proposals: one from TruNorth with several options included in their response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) and a proposal from Sundial Solar.  Based on ownership and upfront costs, and after staff’s analysis and comparison of the two proposals and full submittals from both solar developers, Mr. Culver advised staff was recommending entering into an agreement with Sundial Solar for a Power Purchase Agreement system that the City will then be able to purchase in the sixth year after installation with the use of a charitable contribution for a private sector third party.  Mr. Culver noted the submittal from Sundial was much more detailed and contained several tables providing for a cost analysis and power production analysis.

 

Mr. Culver noted that the TruNorth proposal included the option for one power purchase agreement and another option for a simple direct purchase, with both requiring entering into an energy partnership loan through the St. Paul Port Authority (SPPA) for fifteen years, and based on minimum dollar amounts and assumptions as detailed in the staff report.

 

In analyzing the Sundial proposal, Mr. Culver noted the different power purchase agreement, with installation costs higher, but no upfront financing required of the City for that initial purchase price, and therefore requiring no loan with the SPPA.  Mr. Culver noted this was due to taking advantage of tax equity financing and the power purchase agreement, combined with the charitable contribution at year six for the third party, at which time the City would purchase the system at 5% of the fair market value of the system and the tax equity partner would donate the remainder for a large tax write-off.  Mr. Culver reviewed advantages of this option in overall power savings over a twenty year period, estimating an additional $500,000 would be realized by the City in power savings alone.

 

Mr. Culver advised that, as part of their proposal process, Sundial had toured the roof area and realized it could make much more use of the roof space.

 

In both scenarios, even with a smaller footprint, Mr. Culver advised that there were further advantages with a solar panel system over the arena roof, as additional power savings through less consumption were anticipated due to heat from the roof over the ice surface, a long time issue experienced during a portion of the year in cooling the indoor ice arena space.  Mr. Culver opined that the solar panels would absorb some heat, helping with that energy loss.

 

Based on the long-term analysis provided by Sundial, Mr. Culver reviewed estimated operation and maintenance costs for the City at year 6 of approximately $7,500; but advised additional information was needed for staff’s review and analysis on what those actual maintenance costs assumed, or what components they included; and figuring in the replacement of the entire system in year thirty as that is incorporated into the City’s long-term capital improvement program (CIP).  As with any asset the City owns, Mr. Culver noted that, assuming thirty-year life for the panels, replacement costs would need to be estimated at the end of the life cycle.

 

In conclusion, Mr. Culver advised that staff was recommending entering into a Letter of Intent with Sundial Solar initiating the process of negotiating more final and specific terms for Power Purchase Agreement.  Mr. Culver suggested staff returning to the PWETC at their August meeting with those final provisions, and subsequent recommendation to the City Council for their final approval in September of 2015.

 

At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Culver clarified that the previous Letter of Intent entered into with the Metropolitan Council was still being pursued, and was specific to community garden shares, and would still be needed since the City consumes more power than could be generated on city campus roofs, and if pursued, would allow the City to obtain energy offset from that community solar garden system as well.

 

At the request of Member Lenz, Mr. Culver advised that staff continued to check the references provided as part of Sundial Solar’s proposal; and those reviewed to-date had proven favorable.  Mr. Culver further clarified that the Letter of Intent would be nonbinding, and all steps in the analysis and review process would be completed before entering into a Power Purchase Agreement.  Member Lenz noted that, since this is new technology, there was no long-term history available.

 

At the concerns expressed by Member Wozniak regarding losses from severe weather, Vice Chair Cihacek noted there would be a clause provided in the final Agreement addressing natural disaster costs and remedies; and noted that individual panels could be removed and replaced if the entire system wasn’t damaged.

 

Again, as with any other City asset, Mr. Culver noted the City’s insurance would address losses as part of the City’s overall insurance liability costs and provisions.

 

Member Stenlund asked if both panel systems had their own inverters, or each panel had individual inverters; recommending that the City pursue individual inverters versus a centralized inverter(s) to ensure the majority of the system would continue operating if one small portion was out-of-service.

 

Mr. Culver advised that staff would check on that detail; noting there were several different methodologies still in play and under consideration.  Mr. Culver noted that Sundial had provided a proposal for four large solar arrays with one inverter each; but another option would be to have each row with its own inverter, or each panel as well; and he would seek more detail on that and report back to the PWETC.

 

Member Stenlund noted that would impact maintenance costs, since the inverters would cost more than the panels.  Member Stenlund spoke in support of moving forward with the Sundial Solar proposal.

 

With confirmation by Mr. Culver, Member Seigler clarified that this was still nonbinding and the motion would only authorize negotiations at this point.

 

Vice Chair Cihacek further confirmed this was only at the negotiation stage at this point and nonbinding, as he had concerns and sought further negotiation regarding the proposed annual cost escalator being too high, considered Sundial Solar could offer a better overall price; and other items of concern to him personally that he would provide to staff.  However, Vice Chair Cihacek agreed that Sundial should be the selected vendor and staff initiate negotiations with them.

 

Mr. Culver noted that Sundial Solar would not be installing the system until the spring of 2016, so these would be preliminary negotiations.

 

Member Stenlund moved, Member Heimerl seconded, recommending to the City Council that the City enter into a Letter of Intent with Sundial Solar and staff be authorized to enter into negotiations with the firm preparatory to the City entering into a Power Purchase Agreement for a solar panel system on the Oval/Skating Center roof as detailed in the proposal and staff report dated July 28, 2915.

 

Ayes: 7

Nays: 0

Motion carried.

 

6.            Items for August 25, 2015 Agenda

·         Continued Review and Update of City Campus Solar Installation

·         Discussion of final year of the Leaf Pick-up Program; outreach to residents about termination of the program; and alternatives for residents

 

Vice Chair Cihacek opined that those two discussions would take considerable time, and if any new business needed to be addressed it could be added to an amended agenda.

 

Member Lenz expressed her interest in keeping the agenda on those two items, opining that typical PWETC meetings attempted to pack in too many items.

 

7.            Adjourn

Stenlund moved, Thurnau seconded, adjournment of the meeting at approximately 6:24 p.m. for the PWETC to attend and participate in the “Living Streets & Recycling Workshop” for City Environmental Commissions, being held at Roseville City Hall from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m.

 

Ayes: 7

Nays: 0

Motion carried.

 

 

  1. Roseville MN Homepage

Contact Us

  1. Roseville City Hall

  2. 2660 Civic Center Drive

  3. Roseville, MN 55113


  4. Monday - Friday
    8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.


  5. Phone: 651-792-7000

  6. Email Us

<---- Userway script----->
Arrow Left Arrow Right
Slideshow Left Arrow Slideshow Right Arrow