Roseville MN Homepage
Search
 

View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

Roseville Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission


Meeting Minutes

Tuesday, February 26, 2008, at 6:30 p.m.

 

1.      Introductions/Roll Call

 

            Commission members present:  Randy Neprash, Jan Vanderwall, Ernie Willenbring, and Jim DeBenedet

 

            Commission members absent:  Dwayne Stenlund

 

                   Staff present:  Duane Schwartz, Public Works Director; Deb Bloom, City Engineer

 

                   Others present:  Tim Pratt, City Recycling Coordinator; Alex Danovitch and Chris Goodwin, Eureka Recycling

 

       2. Public Comments

 

                   None

 

3.    Swearing in of New Member

 

            New member Dwayne Stenlund was not in attendance. 

 

4.      Approval of January 22, 2007, Meeting Minutes

         

          Member Vanderwall moved to approve the minutes of the January 22, 2007, meeting of the Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission.  Member Neprash seconded. 

 

                   Ayes:            4

                   Nays:            0

                   Motion carried

 


        5.   Communication Items

 

            Environmental Door Hangers

            Deb Bloom presented three door hangers that staff had created.  Member Vanderwall asked that the door hangers be available in city hall as handouts.

            Member Neprash said the one on trash in the storm sewer wasn’t clear enough and should have better graphics and that it should include a directive to sweep your driveway instead of washing debris into the street.  Ms. Bloom said she was trying to emphasize the city code, but she would take the suggestions under advisement.  Chair DeBenedet thought the reference to paint disposal should be pulled off that same door hanger and set off separately with disposal site information. 

 

Item Out of Order

 

      6.   Eureka Recycling Annual Report

           

            Since Eureka Recycling representatives were waiting in the audience, Chair DeBenedet decided to address his item at this time. 

 

            Alex Danovitch and Chris Goodwin from Eureka Recycling presented their yearly report to the Commission.  There has been a 7% increase in the amount of recycling in Roseville in the last year. 

 

            Member Neprash asked how the City’s share of the recycling profits was used in the budget.  Mr. Pratt said it goes back into the recycling fund and has allowed recycling rates to remain the same even though pickup was increased to once a week.  The fund also paid for recycling containers in parks, as well as other recycling related items.

           

      5.   Communication Items (Continued)

 

            Comprehensive Plan Update

            Duane Schwartz informed the Commission of a Comprehensive Plan Update Open House being held at City Hall on Thursday, March 27 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m.  Chair DeBenedet commented that the process has been going well so far although it’s challenging and there’s a lot of ground to cover.  Public participation has been a concern of those involved.  

 

     Watermain Lining Project

     Mr. Schwartz updated the Commission on the progress of this project. 

    

     Cleanup Day—April 26

     Tim Pratt, City Recycling Coordinator, updated the Commission on Cleanup Day.

 


     Twin Lakes Update

     Ms. Bloom updated the Commission on Twin Lakes.  Member Vanderwall asked when planning a site how do they know what percentage of the property is going to commercial, what residential, etc.  Mr. Schwartz said the land use was anticipated in the master plan. 

 

     Chair DeBenedet said it’s important to note that the total cost of all improvements necessary for the development is allocated back to the redevelopers and doesn’t come out of tax money.

 

     Chair DeBenedet asked if the developer agreements are designed so that there will be a reconciliation of costs at the end of the project.  Mr. Schwartz said the City has retained a financial consultant to work out the details of how development costs are paid back if the City chooses financial participation. 

 

7.      McGough Plan for Twin Lakes

 

     Ms. Bloom presented the McGough plan, which is an application for concept plan that will go before the Planning Commission next week.  Mr. Schwartz said that there isn’t a lot of detail in the concept plan in terms of how buildings are actually located, etc, so it’s important for the PWETC to comment back to the Planning Commission about what they’d like to see. 

 

     Chair DeBenedet was questioning the cul-de-sac size requirement in the report and whether it was necessary since the goal was to use as little pavement as possible.  Ms. Bloom said that the city code for cul-de-sacs was very clear and that’s where the requirement came from.  Member Vanderwall said that for reference the turning radius of a school bus is 106’.

 

     Member Neprash asked if they were heading toward having no Iona Lane.  Ms. Bloom said Iona Lane was never intended to be developed as a major access.  Member Neprash asked why the City wasn’t telling the developer not to build Iona.  Mr. Schwartz said the City has been telling them Iona Lane wasn’t part of the infrastructure plan and if the developer wanted to build it, they would have to pay for it in its entirety.  The developer was also told the city was against them rebuilding it. 

 

     Chair DeBenedet said what he’d like to see is more trees and islands within parking lots.  Member Neprash said he didn’t see how this plan would meet the infiltration water reduction standards of Rice Creek Watershed.  Ms. Bloom said that any developer would need a Rice Creek permit so they would have to meet requirements before construction begins. 

 

     Chair DeBenedet said he is anxious to hear how McGough plans to meet the Rice Creek Watershed standards.  Mr. Schwartz said that maybe a representative from McGough could come to a future meeting to discuss it. 

 

     Member Vanderwall asked if Arthur Street was just going to come to an end.  Mr. Schwartz said no, that the plan was to have it connect to Twin Lakes Parkway in a T intersection. 

 

     Chair DeBenedet said it’s his opinion that the developer’s agreement should move forward requiring as much construction of Twin Lakes Parkway as possible. 

 

8.      Storm Water Annual Report

 

            Chair DeBenedet requested that this be moved to the next meeting, but Ms. Bloom said there were three items in the report that were time sensitive that she wanted to present.  It was decided to discuss the three items tonight and move discussion of the remaining report to the next meeting.

 

9.      Agenda for Next Meeting – March 25, 2008

 

     Storm Water Annual Report (Continued) 

     New Pathways Committee

     Other topics to be determined

 

     A brief discussion was had about the new Pathways Committee.  A volunteer was requested from the Commission.  Member Vanderwall volunteered to serve.

 

10. Adjournment

 

 

 

 

  1. Roseville MN Homepage

Contact Us

  1. Roseville City Hall

  2. 2660 Civic Center Drive

  3. Roseville, MN 55113


  4. Monday - Friday
    8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.


  5. Phone: 651-792-7000

  6. Email Us

<---- Userway script----->
Arrow Left Arrow Right
Slideshow Left Arrow Slideshow Right Arrow